P.S. Do _NOT_ just copy your 1.4 configs to 4.x. Start
with the 4x sample configs and selectively move any
customizations from 1.4 or you'll get burned
by things like schema requiring _version_ in 4.x and
possibly _root_ etc.


Best,
Erick

On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 2:53 AM, David Philip
<davidphilipshe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Raja,
>
>   Could you please mention the list of solr features that you were/are
> using in Solr 1.4. There have been tremendous changes since 1.4 to 4.10.
> Also, you may have to explore solr cloud for resolving the indexing
> operation. But what kind of indexing problems are you facing?
>
> You should look into the link mentioned below. The best way to upgrade from
> such older version to latest is to configure the features that you were
> using in Solr 1.4 into solr 4.10, run test cases and start using it.
>
> Thanks - David.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Upgrading+Solr
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Fri, Nov 28, 2014 at 3:14 PM, <rajadilipchowdary.ko...@cognizant.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> We are using Apache Solr 1.4.1 for our project. Now a days we are facing
>> many problems regarding solr indexing, so when we saw website we found
>> latest version is 4.10, could you please help us in Upgrading the Solr.
>>
>> Is there any specific things which we need to change from our current setup
>>
>> Regards,
>> Raja
>> +91-8121704967
>> This e-mail and any files transmitted with it are for the sole use of the
>> intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged
>> information. If you are not the intended recipient(s), please reply to the
>> sender and destroy all copies of the original message. Any unauthorized
>> review, use, disclosure, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of
>> this email, and/or any action taken in reliance on the contents of this
>> e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Where permitted by
>> applicable law, this e-mail and other e-mail communications sent to and
>> from Cognizant e-mail addresses may be monitored.
>>

Reply via email to