Shamik: Nice job of including the relevant information and just the relevant info!
One addition to what Chris said that _may_ be relevant in future. The "string" type is totally unanalyzed, so sorting done on that field may be case-sensitive, leading to some confusion. If the schema has a "lowercase" type that may be better, it's just KeywordTokenizerFactory and LowercaseFilterFactory as the analysis chain. FWIW, Erick On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 5:25 PM, shamik <sham...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks Hoss for clearing up my doubt. I was confused with the ordering. So I > guess, the first field is always the primary sort field followed by > secondary. > > Thanks again. > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Issue-with-Solr-multiple-sort-tp4181056p4181062.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
