That's my understanding - but use the Solr Admin UI analysis page to confirm exactly what happens, for both index and query analysis.
-- Jack Krupansky On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 10:04 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Jack, > > I read that jira, i understand the concern of heaven. > > So does it mean that, no hole will be left when we will use the stop > filter? > > With Regards > Aman Tandon > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 6:01 PM, Jack Krupansky <jack.krupan...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > Position increments were considered problematic, especially for > > highlighting. Did you get this for the stop filter? There was a Jira for > > this - check CHANGES.TXT and the Jira for details. > > > > For some discussion, see: > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-6468 > > > > > > -- Jack Krupansky > > > > On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 3:01 AM, Aman Tandon <amantandon...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > I was using the enablePositionIncrements in solr 4.8.1 schema. But > when I > > > tries to use it in solr-5.0.0 it is giving error in creating the > > collection > > > > > > If I am correct it was useful in phrase queries. So is there any > > particular > > > reasons for not supporting this option in solr 5? If so, then please > > > explain it to me. Thanks in advance. > > > > > > With Regards > > > Aman Tandon > > > > > >
