> On May 6, 2015, at 8:25 PM, Yonik Seeley <ysee...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On Wed, May 6, 2015 at 8:10 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It’s by design that you can copyField the same source/dest multiple times - >> according to Yonik (not sure where this was discussed), this capability has >> been used in the past to effectively boost terms in the source field. > > Yep, used to be relatively common. > Perhaps the API could be cleaner though if we supported that by > passing an optional "numTimes" or "numCopies"? Seems like a sane > delete / overwrite options would thus be easier?
+1
