For future reference, fq clauses are parsed just like the q clause; they can be arbitrarily complex.
Best, Erick On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 5:52 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote: > after further investigation it looks like the synonym i was testing against > was only associated with one of their multiple divisions (despite being the > most common name for them!). it looks like this may clear the issue up, but > thanks anyway! > > -- > *John Blythe* > Product Manager & Lead Developer > > 251.605.3071 | j...@curvolabs.com > www.curvolabs.com > > 58 Adams Ave > Evansville, IN 47713 > > On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:33 AM, John Blythe <j...@curvolabs.com> wrote: > >> morning everyone, >> >> i'm attempting to find related documents based on a manufacturer's >> competitor. as such i'm querying against the 'description' field with >> manufacturer1's product description but running a filter query with >> manufacturer2's name against the 'mfgname' field. >> >> one of the ways that we help boost our document finding is with a synonym >> dictionary for manufacturer names. many of the larger players have multiple >> divisions, have absorbed smaller companies, etc. so we need all of their >> potential names to map to our record. >> >> i may be wrong, but from my initial testing it doesn't seem to be applying >> to a fq. is there any way of doing this? >> >> thanks- >>
