Yes I did. I use commitWithin to commit after a fixed timeout. Moreover my
add operation works!
در تاریخ 8 ژوئیهٔ 2015 19:32، "Alessandro Benedetti" <
benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> نوشت:

> I just tried on my own, and it is working perfectly.
> Stupid question, have you committed after your update?
>
> Cheers
>
> 2015-07-08 15:41 GMT+01:00 Mohsen Saboorian <mohs...@gmail.com>:
>
> > ​
> > I use add and remove both on a multivalue field (think of tags on a blog
> > post). For this, set null won't work because I want only one value (tag)
> to
> > be removed
> > ​, ​
> > and set null neither remove one nor all of values (all tags here).
> >
> > So I use some
> > ​S
> > olr
> > ​J
> >  code which would translate to something like this:
> >
> > {
> > "id": "docId",
> > ​"tagId": {"remove": "someTagId"}
> > }
> >
> > After commit, there is still taId: someTagId in my document.
> >
> > ​Here is my schema part for tagId:
> > <field name="
> > ​tagId
> > " type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" multiValued="true" />
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Mohsen
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 8, 2015 at 3:26 PM, Alessandro Benedetti <
> > benedetti.ale...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > In this scenarios, Documentation is key :
> > >
> > > Modifier
> > >
> > > Usage
> > >
> > > set
> > >
> > > Set or replace the field value(s) with the specified value(s), or
> *remove
> > > the values if 'null' or empty list is specified as the new value.*
> > >
> > > May be specified as a single value, or as a list for multivalued fields
> > >
> > > add
> > >
> > > Adds the specified values to a multivalued field.
> > >
> > > May be specified as a single value, or as a list.
> > > remove
> > >
> > > Removes (all occurrences of) the specified values from a multivalued
> > field.
> > >
> > > May be specified as a single value, or as a list.
> > > removeregex
> > >
> > > Removes all occurrences of the specified regex from a multiValued
> field.
> > >
> > > May be specified as a single value, or as a list.
> > >
> > > inc
> > >
> > > Increments a numeric value by a specific amount.
> > >
> > > Must be specified as a single numeric value.
> > >
> > > In my opinion "set" is the right direction to look into.
> > > Not sure what happens if you use the remove to remove only a single
> > valued
> > > field value.
> > > Can you explain us what you noticed ? An empty value remain for that
> > field
> > > ?
> > > It is kind of weird, I would expect the field to become null.
> > >
> > > Cheers
> > >
> > >
> > > 2015-07-08 10:34 GMT+01:00 Mohsen Saboorian <mohs...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > In my code when operation is "add" it works correctly on a multivalue
> > > > field. But no multivalue field can be deleted with "remove"
> operation.
> > > > The add operation adds a value to a multivaled field. The remove
> > > operation
> > > > removes a value from a multivalued field.
> > > >
> > > > If you believe that something is not working, please state clearly
> why
> > > you
> > > > believe that something is not working. Start by describing the
> symptom.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -- Jack Krupansky
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Mohsen Saboorian <mohs...@gmail.com>
> > > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > I can partially 'add' fields to my Solr index, but 'remove'
> operation
> > > > seems
> > > > > not working. I'm on Solr 4.10. Here is my SolrJ snippet:
> > > > >
> > > > >             SolrInputDocument doc = new SolrInputDocument();
> > > > >             Map<String, Object> partialUpdate = new HashMap<>();
> > > > >             partialUpdate.put(operation, value); // value can be
> > object
> > > > > (string, number, etc) or list. operation can be add, set or remove.
> > > > >             doc.addField("id", id); // document id
> > > > >             doc.addField(fieldName, partialUpdate);
> > > > >
> > > > >             getSolrServer().add(doc, commitWithin);
> > > > >
> > > > > Is there anything wrong with my code?
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > --------------------------
> > >
> > > Benedetti Alessandro
> > > Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
> > >
> > > "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> > > In the forests of the night,
> > > What immortal hand or eye
> > > Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
> > >
> > > William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
> > >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --------------------------
>
> Benedetti Alessandro
> Visiting card : http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti
>
> "Tyger, tyger burning bright
> In the forests of the night,
> What immortal hand or eye
> Could frame thy fearful symmetry?"
>
> William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England
>

Reply via email to