Shalin,
Thanks, can I also introduce custom entity tags like in my example with the
highlighter output?
Dmitry
On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The thing is that you are trying to introduce custom xml tags which
> require changing the response writers. Instead, if you just used
> nested maps/lists or SimpleOrderedMap/NamedList then every response
> writer should be able to just directly write the output. Nesting is
> not a problem.
>
> On Fri, Aug 7, 2015 at 6:09 PM, Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Shawn:
> >
> > thanks, we found an intermediate solution by serializing our data
> structure
> > using string representation, perhaps less optimal than using binary
> format
> > directly.
> >
> > In the original router with JavaBinCodec we found, that
> > BinaryResponseWriter should also be extended. But the following method is
> > static and does allow extending:
> >
> > public static NamedList<Object> getParsedResponse(SolrQueryRequest
> > req, SolrQueryResponse rsp) {
> > try {
> > Resolver resolver = new Resolver(req, rsp.getReturnFields());
> >
> > ByteArrayOutputStream out = new ByteArrayOutputStream();
> > new JavaBinCodec(resolver).marshal(rsp.getValues(), out);
> >
> > InputStream in = new ByteArrayInputStream(out.toByteArray());
> > return (NamedList<Object>) new JavaBinCodec(resolver).unmarshal(in);
> > }
> > catch (Exception ex) {
> > throw new RuntimeException(ex);
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > Shalin:
> >
> > We needed new data structure in highlighter with more nested levels,
> > than just one. Something like this (in xml representation):
> >
> > <lst name="highlighting">
> > <lst name="doc1">
> > <arr name="snippets">
> > <snippet>
> >
> > <id>id1</id>
> >
> > <contents>Snippet text goes here</contents>
> >
> > <other params/>
> >
> > </snippet>
> >
> > </arr>
> >
> >
> > </lst></lst>
> >
> > Can this be modelled with existing types?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 9:47 PM, Shalin Shekhar Mangar <
> > shalinman...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> What do you mean by a custom format? As long as your custom component
> >> is writing primitives or NamedList/SimpleOrderedMap or collections
> >> such as List/Map, any response writer should be able to handle them.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Aug 5, 2015 at 5:08 PM, Dmitry Kan <solrexp...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > Solr: 5.2.1
> >> > class: org.apache.solr.common.util.JavaBinCodec
> >> >
> >> > I'm working on a custom data structure for the highlighter. The data
> >> > structure is ready in JSON and XML formats. I need also JavaBin
> format.
> >> The
> >> > data structure is already made serializable by extending the
> >> WritableValue
> >> > class (methods write and resolve).
> >> >
> >> > To receive the custom format on the client via solrj api, the data
> >> > structure needs to be parseable by JavaBinCodec. Is this correct
> >> > assumption? Can we introduce the custom data structure consumer on the
> >> > solrj api without complete overhaul of the api? Is there plugin
> framework
> >> > such that JavaBinCodec is extended and used for the new data
> structure?
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Dmitry Kan
> >> > Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
> >> > Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
> >> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
> >> > SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Regards,
> >> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Dmitry Kan
> > Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
> > Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
> > Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
> > SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info
>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
>
--
Dmitry Kan
Luke Toolbox: http://github.com/DmitryKey/luke
Blog: http://dmitrykan.blogspot.com
Twitter: http://twitter.com/dmitrykan
SemanticAnalyzer: www.semanticanalyzer.info
