Hi Erick, The earlier test was done through individual requests. However, my load test is even better.
(1) load test (3 requests/per second/per core) immediately after restarting Solr: average response time: 122 ms (2) load test (5 requests/per second/per core) immediately after restarting Solr: average response time: 120 ms (3) warm-up (filter cache not warmed up with !cache=false) with a load of 3 requests/per second/per core for 40 rounds, then load test with a load of 5 requests/per second/per core for 40 rounds: average response time: 72 ms It is now very obvious that the previously slower query response time (on average: 500ms) with filter cache enabled in our demanding query was due to extra processing to fill the cache for all the randomly generated requests. This performance (<100 ms) should be good enough in production for our project. However, I would like to know if this response time is a typical "Solr speed" based on 15 M records. Thanks -- View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Performance-gain-with-setting-cache-false-in-the-query-for-complex-queries-tp4224931p4224988.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
