you don't need to use a dynamic field, just a normal field will work for you. But, you *will* want to index it, and you may benefit from docValues, so:
<field name="like_count" type="int" indexed="true" stored="true" docValues="true"/> Upayavira On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:59 AM, sara hajili wrote: > my solr version is 5.2.1 > i have a question. > if i create 2 core .one for post and one for like . i must index like > count? > i mean in schema for like core i must write: > <dynamicField name="like_count" type="int" indexed="false" > stored="true"/> > > am i true? > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015 at 2:42 AM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > So you want to be able to sort by the "number of likes" value for a > > post? > > > > What version of Solr are you using? How many posts do you have? > > > > There's a neat feature in Solr 5.2.1 (I'm pretty sure it is there, not > > 5.3) called score joins. Using that you can have two cores, one > > containing your posts, and another containing your likes. > > > > You cannot *sort* on these values, but you can include your likes into > > the score, which might even be better. > > > > If this sounds good, I can dig up some syntax for such a query. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Tue, Sep 1, 2015, at 10:36 AM, sara hajili wrote: > > > hi. > > > at first i.m sorry for my bad english! > > > i have a social app.i want to use solr for searching in this app. > > > i have many document (in my case people text that posted on my social > > > app). > > > and i indexed this. > > > but i'm have 1 issue and it is : > > > > > > i have very doc(post) and they have a property "like" is it good > > > approach > > > to index like count (people can like eachother post in my social app)? > > > likecount change more and more in one day.(so as i know it must be set > > > dynamic field) > > > and if i indexed it ,i think it costs alot , to update and index > > > likecount > > > more and more even i use bach update. > > > so is it approach to didn't index one field in solr but i could sort my > > > search result according to that unindexed field? > > > > > > tnx > >
