I just gave an example API call, but for your scenario, the replicationFactor will be 4 (replicationFactor=4). In this way, all 4 machines will have the same copy of the data and you can put an LB in front of those 4 machines.
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:00 PM, Ravi Solr <ravis...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK...I understood numShards=1, when you say replicationFactor=2 what does > it mean ? I have 4 machines, then, only 3 copies of data (1 at leader and 2 > replicas) ?? so am i not under utilizing one machine ? > > I was more thinking in the lines of a Mesh connectivity format i.e. > everybody has others copy so that I can put all 4 machines behind a Load > Balancer...Is that a wrong way to look at it ? > > Thanks > > Ravi Kiran > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 2:51 PM, Sameer Maggon <sam...@measuredsearch.com> > wrote: > > > You'll have to say numShards=1 and replicationFactor=2. > > > > http:// > > > > > [hostname]:8983/solr/admin/collections?action=CREATE&name=test&configName=test&numShards=1&replicationFactor=2 > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 11:23 AM, Ravi Solr <ravis...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > Thank you very much for responding Sameer so numShards=0 and > > > replicationFactr=4 if I have 4 machines ?? > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Ravi Kiran Bhaskar > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 12:56 PM, Sameer Maggon < > > sam...@measuredsearch.com > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > Absolutely. You can have a collection with just replicas and no > shards > > > for > > > > redundancy and have a load balancer in front of it that removes the > > > > dependency on a single node. One of them will assume the role of a > > > leader, > > > > and in case that leader goes down, one of the replicas will be > elected > > > as a > > > > leader and your application will be fine. > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > > On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 9:44 AM, Ravi Solr <ravis...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello, > > > > > We are trying to move away from Master-Slave configuration > > to > > > a > > > > > SolrCloud environment. I have a couple of questions. Currently in > the > > > > > Master-Slave setup we have 4 Machines 2 of which are indexers and 2 > > of > > > > them > > > > > are query servers. The query servers are fronted via Load Balancer. > > > > > > > > > > There are 3 solr cores for 3 different/separate applications > > (mutually > > > > > exclusive). Each core is a complete index of all docs (i.e. the > data > > is > > > > not > > > > > sharded). > > > > > > > > > > We intend to keep it in a non-sharded mode even after the > > > SolrCloud > > > > > mode.The prime motivation to move to cloud is to effectively use > all > > > > > servers for indexing and querying (read fault tolerant/redundant). > > > > > > > > > > So, the real question is, can SolrCloud be used without shards ? > > i.e. a > > > > > "collection" resides entirely on one machine rather than > partitioning > > > > data > > > > > onto different machines ? > > > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > > > Ravi Kiran Bhaskar > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > *Sameer Maggon* > > > > Measured Search > > > > c: 310.344.7266 > > > > www.measuredsearch.com <http://measuredsearch.com> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > *Sameer Maggon* > > Measured Search > > c: 310.344.7266 > > www.measuredsearch.com <http://measuredsearch.com> > > > -- *Sameer Maggon* Measured Search c: 310.344.7266 www.measuredsearch.com <http://measuredsearch.com>
