Is it possible to understand better this : "as it doesn't allow any meaningful customization " ?
Cheers On 8 October 2015 at 15:27, Andrea Roggerone <andrearoggerone.o...@gmail.com > wrote: > Hi guys, > I don't think that sorting is a good solution in this case as it doesn't > allow any meaningful customization.I believe that the advised > QueryElevationComponent is one of the viable alternative. Another one would > be to boost at query time a particular field, like for instance paid. That > would allow you to assign different boosts to different values using a > function. > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Upayavira <u...@odoko.co.uk> wrote: > > > Or just have a field in your index - > > > > paid: true/false > > > > Then sort=paid desc, score desc > > > > (you may need to sort paid asc, not sure which way a boolean would sort) > > > > Question is whether you want to show ALL paid posts, or just a set of > > them. For the latter you could use result grouping on the paid field. > > > > Upayavira > > > > On Thu, Oct 8, 2015, at 01:34 PM, NutchDev wrote: > > > Hi Christian, > > > > > > You can take a look at Solr's QueryElevationComponent > > > <https://wiki.apache.org/solr/QueryElevationComponent> . > > > > > > It will allow you to configure the top results for a given query > > > regardless > > > of the normal lucene scoring. Also you can specify exclude document > list > > > to > > > exclude certain results for perticular query. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/How-to-show-some-documents-ahead-of-others-tp4233481p4233490.html > > > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > -- -------------------------- Benedetti Alessandro Visiting card - http://about.me/alessandro_benedetti Blog - http://alexbenedetti.blogspot.co.uk "Tyger, tyger burning bright In the forests of the night, What immortal hand or eye Could frame thy fearful symmetry?" William Blake - Songs of Experience -1794 England