Hi, I have 100's of fields to search against based on some pre-defined static rules. So fields A, B, C to be searched as group-X, fields A, B, D, E, F as group-Y, fields B, E, F, G as group-Z. Each group is made up of 100's of fields (at least 500).
I can use copyField variations to copy into each group, or I can code the copy logic into my Java code (which is what I'm doing now) and have it copy into each group. My question is two folds: 1) Give my need, am I losing anything by writing my own copy-field in my Java code vs. using Solr's copyField in the schema? 2) How do I prevent a case where when I copy data from field A and B where A has "Fable of the Throbbing" and B has "Genius of a Tank Town" which get copied into group-X as "Fable of the Throbbing Genius of a Tank Town". When this happens, a phrase search for "Throbbing Genius" will get me a hit (when in reality, it shouldn't). If I was using copyField, wouldn't this problem still exists? Thanks in advanced. Steve
