What is your query? On Mon, 21 Dec 2015, 14:37 elisabeth benoit <elisaelisael...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello all, > > I am using solr 4.10.1 and I have configured my pf2 pf3 like this > > <str name="pf2">catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2</str> > <str name="pf3">catchall~0^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms^0.2</str> > > my search field (qf) is my catchall field > > I'v been trying to change slop in pf2, pf3 for catchall and synonyms (going > from 0, or default value for synonyms, to 1) > > pf2=catchall~1^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms~1^0.2 > pf3=catchall~1^0.2 name~0^0.21 synonyms~1^0.2 > > but some results are not ordered the same way anymore even if I get the > same MATCH values in debugQuery output > > For instance, for a doc matching bastill in catchall field (and nothing to > do with pf2, pf3!) > > with first pf2, pf3 > > 0.5163083 = (MATCH) weight(catchall:bastill in 105256) [NoTFIDFSimilarity], > result of: > * 0.5163083 = score(doc=105256,freq=2.0 = termFreq=2.0* > ), product of: > * 0.5163083 = queryWeight,* product of: > 1.0 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=12258543) > 0.5163083 = queryNorm > 1.0 = fieldWeight in 105256, product of: > 1.0 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: > 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 > 1.0 = idf(docFreq=134, maxDocs=12258543) > 1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=105256) > 0.5163083 = (MATCH) weight(catchall:paris in 105256) > [NoTFIDFSimilarity], result of: > 0.5163083 = score(doc=105256,freq=6.0 = termFreq=6.0 > > and when I change pf2 pf3 (the only change, same query, same docs) > > 0.47504464 = (MATCH) weight(catchall:paris in 105256) [NoTFIDFSimilarity], > result of: > * 0.47504464 = score(doc=105256,freq=6.0 = termFreq=6.0* > ), product of: > * 0.47504464 = queryWeight*, product of: > 1.0 = idf(docFreq=10958, maxDocs=12258543) > 0.47504464 = queryNorm > 1.0 = fieldWeight in 105256, product of: > 1.0 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: > 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 > 1.0 = idf(docFreq=10958, maxDocs=12258543) > 1.0 = fieldNorm(doc=105256) > > so in the end, with same MATCH results, in first case I get two documents > with same score, and in second case, one document has a higher score. > > This seem very very strange. Does anyone have a clue what's going on? > > Thanks > Elisabeth > -- Regards, Binoy Dalal
