I don't believe that was ever supported. But Scott and I have been working
through SOLR-3191 recently to get that need addressed. Maybe some time next
week we will have a ready to commit patch up.
Erik
> On Mar 5, 2016, at 22:19, William Bell <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> it used to support
>
> fl=*,-field
>
> Does that not work now?
>
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2016 at 7:37 PM, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
>> I have yet to find any workaround so far.Still have to list out all the
>> remaining fields one by one.
>>
>> Does anyone else has any suggestions?
>>
>> Regards,
>> Edwin
>>
>>
>>> On 18 February 2016 at 17:07, Anil <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> I am looking for the same. please do let me know just in case you find
>>> workaround.
>>>
>>> On 18 February 2016 at 14:18, Zheng Lin Edwin Yeo <[email protected]>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Would like to find out, is there already a way to exclude field from
>> the
>>>> Solr response. I did came across SOLR-3191 which was created about 4
>>> years
>>>> ago, but could not find any workable solutions from there.
>>>>
>>>> As my collections can have more than 100 fields, and I would need to
>>> return
>>>> the majority of then except for one or two, so if there is a way to
>>> exclude
>>>> the fields would be good, if not I have to list all the remaining
>> fields
>>>> (which can be more than 100 for each collections).
>>>>
>>>> I am using Solr 5.4.0.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Edwin
>
>
>
> --
> Bill Bell
> [email protected]
> cell 720-256-8076
