Solrcloud.. Faster discs.. Multiple cores on different physical discs would help On Mar 9, 2016 2:22 PM, "Vincenzo D'Amore" <v.dam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Upgrading to Solr 5 you should improve your indexing performance. > > > http://lucidworks.com/blog/2015/06/10/indexing-performance-solr-5-2-now-twice-fast/ > > On Wed, Mar 9, 2016 at 1:13 PM, Avner Levy <av...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > > > Currently I'm using Solr 4.8.1 but I can move to another version if it > > performs significantly faster. > > My target is to reach the max indexing throughput possible on the > machine. > > Since it seems the indexing process is CPU bound I was wondering whether > > 32 logical cores with twice indexing threads will perform better. > > Thanks, > > Avner > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ilan Schwarts [mailto:ila...@gmail.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 09, 2016 9:09 AM > > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > > Subject: Re: Disable hyper-threading for better Solr performance? > > > > What is the solr version and shard config? Standalone? Multiple cores? > > Spread over RAID ? > > On Mar 9, 2016 9:00 AM, "Avner Levy" <av...@checkpoint.com> wrote: > > > > > I have a machine with 16 real cores (32 with HT enabled). > > > I'm running on it a Solr server and trying to reach maximum > > > performance for indexing and queries (indexing 20k documents/sec by a > > > number of threads). > > > I've read on multiple places that in some scenarios / products > > > disabling the hyper-threading may result in better performance results. > > > I'm looking for inputs / insights about HT on Solr setups. > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Avner > > > > > > > > > Email secured by Check Point > > > > > > -- > Vincenzo D'Amore > email: v.dam...@gmail.com > skype: free.dev > mobile: +39 349 8513251 >
