Oh thanks.
I don't want to search on that. I will have a name field that contains the
unique identifier of the document.
2008/7/9 Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:46 PM, Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ्
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > yep. you cant search. It is better to extract the data out and index
> > it if you want to search
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 8:37 PM, Norberto Meijome <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >> On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:51:45 +0530
> >> "Noble Paul _____________________ __________________" <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> You can put it into a 'string' field directly
> >>
> >> if we refer to the default string field , you won't be able to search
> for the contents of the XML (unless you search for the whole thing),right?
> >>
> >> _________________________
> >> {Beto|Norberto|Numard} Meijome
> >>
> >> Law of Conservation of Perversity:
> >> we can't make something simpler without making something else more
> complex
> >>
> >> I speak for myself, not my employer. Contents may be hot. Slippery when
> wet. Reading disclaimers makes you go blind. Writing them is worse. You have
> been Warned.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > --Noble Paul
> >
>
>
>
> --
> --Noble Paul
>
--
Alexander Ramos Jardim
