Ok, I think I know the problem you're running into. You'll need to load the
solr-solrj jar after loading the jars in the solrj-lib. Otherwise DbVis
seems to get confused and lose the driver class. We'll work on putting out
a single jar for the JDBC driver.

Joel Bernstein
http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 4:23 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com> wrote:

> I just added the driver again to DBVisualizer and it found it for me. You
> can see the attached screen shot.
>
> Joel Bernstein
> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>
> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:13 PM, Joel Bernstein <joels...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> What version of DbVisualizer are you using?
>>
>> When I tested I was using the latest version.
>>
>> Joel Bernstein
>> http://joelsolr.blogspot.com/
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:47 PM, Reth RM <reth.ik...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> output of command :
>>>
>>> org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/
>>>    META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver
>>>   org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ConnectionImpl.class
>>>  org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/DatabaseMetaDataImpl.class
>>>    org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/DriverImpl.class
>>>  org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ResultSetImpl.class
>>>    org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ResultSetMetaDataImpl.class
>>>   org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/StatementImpl.class
>>>    org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/package-info.class
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 9:01 PM, Kevin Risden <risd...@avalonconsult.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> > >
>>> > > Page 11, the screenshot specifies to select a
>>> > > "solr-solrj-6.0.0-SNAPSHOT.jar" which is equivalent into
>>> > > "solr-solrj-6.0.0.jar" shipped with released version, correct?
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > Correct the PDF was generated before 6.0.0 was released. The
>>> documentation
>>> > from SOLR-8521 is being migrated to here:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Parallel+SQL+Interface#ParallelSQLInterface-SQLClientsandDatabaseVisualizationTools
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > > When I try adding that jar, it doesn't show up driver class,
>>> DBVisualizer
>>> > > still shows "No new driver class". Does it mean the class is not
>>> added to
>>> > > this jar yet?
>>> > >
>>> >
>>> > I checked the Solr 6.0.0 release and the driver is there. I was
>>> testing it
>>> > yesterday for a blog series that I'm putting together.
>>> >
>>> > Just for reference here is the output for the Solr 6 release:
>>> >
>>> > tar -tvf solr-solrj-6.0.0.jar | grep sql
>>> > drwxrwxrwx  0 0      0           0 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0         842 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > META-INF/services/java.sql.Driver
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0       10124 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ConnectionImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0       23557 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/DatabaseMetaDataImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0        4459 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/DriverImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0       28333 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ResultSetImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0        5167 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/ResultSetMetaDataImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0       10451 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/StatementImpl.class
>>> > -rwxrwxrwx  0 0      0         141 Apr  1 14:40
>>> > org/apache/solr/client/solrj/io/sql/package-info.class
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Kevin Risden
>>> > Apache Lucene/Solr Committer
>>> > Hadoop and Search Tech Lead | Avalon Consulting, LLC
>>> > <http://www.avalonconsult.com/>
>>> > M: 732 213 8417
>>> > LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/company/avalon-consulting-llc> |
>>> Google+
>>> > <http://www.google.com/+AvalonConsultingLLC> | Twitter
>>> > <https://twitter.com/avalonconsult>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> > This message (including any attachments) contains confidential
>>> information
>>> > intended for a specific individual and purpose, and is protected by
>>> law. If
>>> > you are not the intended recipient, you should delete this message. Any
>>> > disclosure, copying, or distribution of this message, or the taking of
>>> any
>>> > action based on it, is strictly prohibited.
>>> >
>>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to