Britske wrote: > > When performing these queries I notice a big difference between qTime > (which is mostly in the 15-30 ms range due to caching) and total time > taken to return the response (measured through SolrJ's elapsedTime), which > takes between 500-1600 ms. > Documents have a lot of stored fields (more than 10.000), but at any given > query a maximum of say 20 are returned (through fl-field ) or used (as > part of filtering, faceting, sorting) >
Hi Britske, how do you manage 10.000 field definitions? Sorry I didn't understand... Guys, I am constantly seeing the same problem, athough I have just a few small fields defined, lazyLoading is disabled, and memory is more than enough (25Gb for SOLR, 7Gb for OS, 3Gb index). Britske, do you see the difference with faceted queries only? Yonik, I am suspecting there is _bug_ with SOLR faceting so that faceted query time (qtime) is 10-20ms and elapsed time is huge; SOLR has filterCache where Key is 'filter'; SOLR does not have any <queryFacetResultCache> where Key is 'query' and Value is 'facets'... Am I right? -Fuad -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/big-discrepancy-between-elapsedtime-and-qtime-although-enableLazyFieldLoading%3D-true-tp18698590p18736155.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
