Mind you I have no proof that this will cure the problem in 5.2.1, but it seems like it'd be quick to test....
Good Luck! Erick On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 8:51 PM, Manohar Sripada <manohar...@gmail.com> wrote: > Sure Erick! I will try applying the patch. > > Thanks > > On Wednesday, September 28, 2016, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> AnalyzingInfixSuggester is a mini Solr index, it's working >> as designed by returning the choices you see. I don't think >> you can persuade it to do what you want OOB. >> >> I took a quick look at SOLR-7865 and it's a very simple fix, just >> 3 lines of code change and the rest is test code. Could you >> consider applying that patch to the 5.2.1 code base? and using that >> rather than fully upgrading? >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> On Wed, Sep 28, 2016 at 4:21 AM, Manohar Sripada <manohar...@gmail.com >> <javascript:;>> wrote: >> > I am implementing auto suggestion on Business Name. I >> > used BlendedInfixLookupFactory which worked in all my uses until I >> > encountered into this bug (https://issues.apache.org/ >> jira/browse/SOLR-7865), >> > where suggest.count doesn't work in Solr 5.2.1. But, I can't upgrade >> > anytime soon. :( >> > >> > I tried using AnalyzingInfixSuggester, but, I encountered couple of >> issues >> > with this. Can someone help me with these? >> > >> > 1. This lookupImpl is returning duplicate business names ( >> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-6336) in results (the >> data >> > has duplicate business names) which isn't happening >> > with BlendedInfixLookupFactory. I don't want duplicate values. >> > 2. Second one is, AnalyzingInfixSuggester is searching on all input >> > keywords - For example, if am looking for "Apple Corporation", it is >> > returning, "Apple Inc", "Apple Corporation", "Oracle Corporation", >> > "Microsoft Corporation". I need the data with only "Apple >> Corporation". >> > Again, this is working fine in BlendedInfixLookupFactory. >> > >> > I don't want fuzzy searches, so, I am not using it. >> > >> > Below are the respective configurations. The fields type uses Standard >> > Tokenizer. >> > >> > <lst name="suggester"> >> > <str name="name">businessName_BIF</str> >> > <str name="lookupImpl">BlendedInfixLookupFactory</str> >> > <str name="dictionaryImpl">DocumentDictionaryFactory</str> >> > <str name="field">business_name</str> >> > <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str> >> > <str name="buildOnOptimize">true</str> >> > <str name="buildOnStartup">true</str> >> > <!--LookupImpl Specific properties --> >> > <str name="suggestAnalyzerFieldType">text_standard</str> >> > <str name="exactMatchFirst">true</str> >> > <str name="preserveSep">true</str> >> > <str name="preservePositionIncrements">true</str> >> > <str name="indexPath">suggest_test_business_name_bif</str> >> > <str name="minPrefixChars">0</str> >> > <str name="highlight">false</str> >> > <str name="blenderType">linear</str> >> > <str name="numFactor">10</str> >> > <!--DictionaryImpl Specific properties --> >> > <str name="weightField">revenues</str> >> > <str name="payloadField">id</str> >> > </lst> >> > >> > <lst name="suggester"> >> > <str name="name">businessName_AIF</str> >> > <str name="lookupImpl">AnalyzingInfixLookupFactory</str> >> > <str name="dictionaryImpl">DocumentDictionaryFactory</str> >> > <str name="field">business_name</str> >> > <str name="buildOnCommit">true</str> >> > <str name="buildOnOptimize">true</str> >> > <str name="buildOnStartup">true</str> >> > <!--LookupImpl Specific properties --> >> > <str name="suggestAnalyzerFieldType">text_standard</str> >> > <str name="exactMatchFirst">true</str> >> > <str name="preserveSep">true</str> >> > <str name="preservePositionIncrements">true</str> >> > <str name="indexPath">suggest_test_business_name_aif</str> >> > <str name="minPrefixChars">0</str> >> > <str name="allTermsRequired">true</str> >> > <str name="highlight">false</str> >> > <!--DictionaryImpl Specific properties --> >> > <str name="weightField">revenues</str> >> > <str name="payloadField">id</str> >> > </lst> >>
