Expanding on my comment on the ticket, I’m really quite happy with using 
codahale/dropwizard metrics with Solr. I don’t know if I’m comfortable just 
sharing a screenshot of the resulting grafana dashboard, but I’ve got, per-host:

- Percentile latencies and rates for GET vs POST (which in solrcloud generally 
maps to top-level-query vs shard-request & update) (From the jetty-metrics 
plugin)
- Log rates by log level (from the logging-metrics plugin)
- GC time (from the jvm-metrics plugin)
- Thread counts (same)
- Percentile latencies and rates per query “performance class” (from my 
metrics-aware backup request handler - https://github.com/whitepages/SOLR-4449) 
- Backup request rates (same)

I’ve been agitating the idea of getting metrics more tightly integrated for at 
least a year, maybe longer. I’ve been using the jetty metrics plugin since at 
least Solr 4.9, and have upgraded and re-added it at least twice.


On 11/1/16, 11:56 AM, "Walter Underwood" <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote:

    Anybody?
    
    It seems like this would be a solution for SOLR-4735, which has been open 
for 3.5 years.
    
    https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735 
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4735>
    
    wunder
    Walter Underwood
    wun...@wunderwood.org
    http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
    
    
    > On Oct 26, 2016, at 12:02 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> 
wrote:
    > 
    > Anybody using the CodaHale metrics.jetty9.InstrumentedHandler? It looks a 
lot like something we built for our own use with Solr 4.
    > 
    > http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/manual/jetty/ 
<http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/manual/jetty/>
    > 
http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/apidocs/com/codahale/metrics/jetty9/InstrumentedHandler.html
 
<http://metrics.dropwizard.io/3.1.0/apidocs/com/codahale/metrics/jetty9/InstrumentedHandler.html>
    > 
    > wunder
    > Walter Underwood
    > wun...@wunderwood.org <mailto:wun...@wunderwood.org>
    > http://observer.wunderwood.org/  (my blog)
    
    

Reply via email to