It's not mentioned on that page, but I'm assuming the join should work on solrcloud when joining the same collection with the same routing (example: users and user_events both routed by user_id (and joining on user_id))
On Thu, Nov 17, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch <arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: > You want just the usual join (not the block-join). That's the way it > was before nested documents became supported. > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/solr/Other+ > Parsers#OtherParsers-JoinQueryParser > > Also, Elasticsearch - as far as I remember - stores the original > document structure (including children) as a special field and then > flattens all the children into parallel fields within parent. Which > causes interesting hidden ranking issues, but that's an issue for a > different day. > > Rgards, > Alex. > ---- > Solr Example reading group is starting November 2016, join us at > http://j.mp/SolrERG > Newsletter and resources for Solr beginners and intermediates: > http://www.solr-start.com/ > > > On 17 November 2016 at 18:08, Dorian Hoxha <dorian.ho...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm not finding a way to support parent-child like es does (using > > blockjoin)? I've seen some blogs > > <http://www.slideshare.net/anshumg/working-with-deeply- > nested-documents-in-apache-solr> > > with having children as nested inside the parent-document, but I want to > > freely crud childs/parents as separate documents (i know that nested also > > writes separate documents) and have a special field to link them + > manually > > route them to the same shard. > > > > Is this possible/available ? > > > > Thank You >