Hello Fabien,
I believe parentFilter should be type_s:up, and consequently the type_s:up
should go in fq.
On Tue, Jan 24, 2017 at 3:30 PM, Fabien Renaud <fabien.ren...@findwise.com>
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm wondering if I missed something in my code (which uses solrj 6.3):
>
> public class Main {
>
> private SolrClient client1;
>
> public void run() {
> client1 = new HttpSolrClient.Builder("http://localhost:8983/solr
> ").build();
>
> SolrInputDocument doc1 = new SolrInputDocument();
>
> doc1.addField("id", "1");
> doc1.addField("type_s", "up");
> SolrInputDocument doc2 = new SolrInputDocument();
>
> doc2.addField("id", "2");
> doc2.addField("type_s", "down");
>
> doc1.addChildDocument(doc2);
>
> SolrInputDocument doc4 = new SolrInputDocument();
> doc4.addField("id", "4");
> doc4.addField("type_s", "up");
>
> SolrInputDocument doc5 = new SolrInputDocument();
> doc5.addField("id", "5");
> doc5.addField("type_s", "down");
>
> doc4.addChildDocument(doc5);
>
> try {
> client1.add("techproducts", Arrays.asList(doc1,doc4));
> } catch (Exception e) {
> System.out.println("Indexing failed" + e);
> }
> }
>
> If I start Solr 6.3 using bin/start start -e techproduct and ask the
> following:
>
> http://localhost:8983/solr/techproducts/select?fl=*,[
> child%20parentFilter=type_s:down]&fq=type_s:down&indent=on&q=*:*&wt=json
>
>
> then I get:
>
> {
> "docs": [
> {
> "id": "2",
> "type_s": "down"
> },
> {
> "id": "5",
> "type_s": "down",
> "_childDocuments_": [
> {
> "id": "1",
> "type_s": "up"
> }
> ]
> }
> ]
> }
>
> which seems to be a bug for me. Or did I miss something?
> Notice that the relations "2 is a child of 1" and "5 is a child of 4" are
> working fine. It's just that I get extra (unwanted and unrelated) relations.
>
> Notice that at some point I manage to get back two documents with the
> __same__ id (with different version). I'm not able to reproduce this but I
> guess it could be related.
>
> Fabien
>
>
--
Sincerely yours
Mikhail Khludnev
