Did you try: Set your acceptor count, SelectChannelConnector.setAcceptors(int) <http://download.eclipse.org/jetty/stable-7/apidocs/org/eclipse/jetty/server/AbstractConnector.html#setAcceptors%28int%29> to be a a value between 1 and (number_of_cpu_cores - 1).
On Fri, Jan 27, 2017 at 3:22 AM, Gerald Reinhart <gerald.reinh...@kelkoo.com > wrote: > Hello, > > We are migrating our platform > from > - Solr 5.4.1 hosted by a Tomcat > to > - Solr 5.4.1 standalone (hosted by Jetty) > > => Jetty is 15% slower than Tomcat in the same conditions. > > > Here are details about the benchmarks : > > Context : > - Index with 9 000 000 documents > - Gatling launch queries extracted from the real traffic > - Server : R410 with 16 virtual CPU and 96G mem > > Results with 20 clients in // during 10 minutes: > For Tomcat : > - 165 Queries per seconds > - 120ms mean response time > > For Jetty : > - 139 Queries per seconds > - 142ms mean response time > > We have checked : > - the load of the server => same > - the io wait => same > - the memory used in the JVM => same > - JVM GC settings => same > > For us, it's a blocker for the migration. > > Is it a known issue ? (I found that : > http://www.asjava.com/jetty/jetty-vs-tomcat-performance-comparison/) > > How can we improve the performance of Jetty ? (We have already > followed > http://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/9.2.21.v20170120/ > optimizing.html > recommendation) > > Many thanks, > > > Gérald Reinhart > > > Kelkoo SAS > Société par Actions Simplifiée > Au capital de € 4.168.964,30 > Siège social : 158 Ter Rue du Temple 75003 Paris > 425 093 069 RCS Paris > > Ce message et les pièces jointes sont confidentiels et établis à > l'attention exclusive de leurs destinataires. Si vous n'êtes pas le > destinataire de ce message, merci de le détruire et d'en avertir > l'expéditeur. > -- Bill Bell billnb...@gmail.com cell 720-256-8076
