Thank Grant for the update.  We have found that the lucene-2.4-dev libs are a 
bit out dated.  My colleague is going to open a bug about this.  Has any 
thought been made as to what snapshot of the lucene-2.4-dev libs will be used 
for solr 1.3?  I also like the idea of renaming them to lucene-2.4-solr.  I 
think having libs with "-dev" can be a bit scary to people who are putting solr 
1.3 in production.

Thanks!
Andrew

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Grant Ingersoll [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 13, 2008 9:44 AM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Solr1.3 Freeze
>
> We are getting there, though, and it is a high priority.  :-)  It will
> use 2.4-dev, as far as I can tell, unless the Lucene community all of
> a sudden decides to ship.  Not to worry, however, as Hoss has
> explained a number of times, it is the Lucene PMC that makes releases,
> not Lucene Java or Solr communities.  So, by us making a Solr release
> w/ that version, we are effectively releasing that copy of Lucene.
> Maybe we should call it lucene-2.4-solr.jar so as to drop the word dev
> from it.
>
> One of the best things the community can do to help, is to download
> and try out trunk, as well as the release candidates that we will be
> posting during the freeze, and give us feedback.  Because 1.3 has a
> lot of changes (we hope for the better), this will be especially
> important.
>
> -Grant
>
> On Aug 12, 2008, at 10:45 PM, Chris Hostetter wrote:
>
> >
> > : I read on the Solr 1.3 wiki page that there is a code freeze as of
> > : today, is this still accurate?  Moreover - does this mean that
> > Solr1.3
> > : will most likely ship with Lucene 2.4-dev or is there any plan to
> > wait
> > : for lucene 2.4 to be released?
> >
> > People who are interested in following/discussing the release process
> > should keep tabs on solr-dev ... Grant volunteered to act as the
> > Release
> > Manager for 1.3, and (to paraphrase his comments from a few hours
> > ago) he
> > does not feel we are quite ready for a feature freeze.
> >
> >
> > -Hoss
> >
>

Reply via email to