Hi Rich, Query creation is correct only thing what causing the problem is that Boolean + query while building the lucene query which causing all tokens to be matched in the document (equivalent of mm=100%) even though I use mm=1 it was using BOOLEAN + query as normal query one plus one abc Lucene query - +(((+nameShingle:one plus +nameShingle:plus one +nameShingle:one abc)) ((+nameShingle:one plus +nameShingle:plus one abc)) ((+nameShingle:one plus one +nameShingle:one abc)) (nameShingle:one plus one abc))
Now since my doc contains only one plus one thus -- one plus ,plus one, one plus one thus due to Boolean + it was not matching. Thanks, Aman Deep Singh On Fri, Mar 31, 2017 at 4:41 PM Rick Leir <rl...@leirtech.com> wrote: > Hi Aman > Did you try the Admin Analysis tool? It will show you which filters are > effective at index and query time. It will help you understand why you are > not getting a mach. > Cheers -- Rick > > On March 31, 2017 2:36:33 AM EDT, Aman Deep Singh < > amandeep.coo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >Hi, > >I was trying to use the shingle filter but it was not creating the > >query as > >desirable. > > > >my schema is > ><fieldType name="cust_shingle" class="solr.TextField" > >positionIncrementGap= > >"100"> <analyzer> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/> > ><filter > >class="solr.ShingleFilterFactory" outputUnigrams="false" > >maxShingleSize="4" > >/> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> </analyzer> > ></fieldType> > ><field name="nameShingle" type="cust_shingle" indexed="true" > >stored="true"/> > > > >my solr query is > > > http://localhost:8983/solr/productCollection/select?defType=edismax&debugQuery=true&q=one%20plus%20one%20four&qf=nameShingle&; > >*sow=false*&wt=xml > > > >and it was creating the parsed query as > ><str name="parsedquery"> > >(+(DisjunctionMaxQuery(((+nameShingle:one plus +nameShingle:plus one > >+nameShingle:one four))) DisjunctionMaxQuery(((+nameShingle:one plus > >+nameShingle:plus one four))) DisjunctionMaxQuery(((+nameShingle:one > >plus > >one +nameShingle:one four))) DisjunctionMaxQuery((nameShingle:one plus > >one > >four)))~1)/no_coord > ></str> > ><str name="parsedquery_toString"> > >*+((((+nameShingle:one plus +nameShingle:plus one +nameShingle:one > >four)) > >((+nameShingle:one plus +nameShingle:plus one four)) ((+nameShingle:one > >plus one +nameShingle:one four)) (nameShingle:one plus one four))~1)* > ></str> > > > > > >So ideally token creations is perfect but in the query it is using > >boolean + operator which is causing the problem as if i have a document > >with name as > >"one plus one" ,according to the shingles it has to matched as its > >token > >will be ("one plus","one plus one","plus one") . > >I have tried using the q.op and played around the mm also but nothing > >is > >giving me the correct response. > >Any idea how i can fetch that document even if the document is missing > >any > >token. > > > >My expected response will be getting the document > >"one plus one" even the user query has any additional term like "one > >plus > >one two" and so on. > > > > > >Thanks, > >Aman Deep Singh > > -- > Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
