On the other hand, that query does not do what I want. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 2:18 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Btw, what is the difference between > > +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *])) > > and > > +name:test +(type:research -type:[* TO *]) > > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 1:33 PM, Furkan KAMACI <furkankam...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Actually, amount of documents which have 'type' field is relatively too >> small across all documents at index. >> >> On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 7:08 AM, Alexandre Rafalovitch < >> arafa...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> What about setting a default value for the field? That is probably >>> faster than negative search clauses? >>> >>> Regards, >>> Alex. >>> ---- >>> http://www.solr-start.com/ - Resources for Solr users, new and >>> experienced >>> >>> >>> On 16 April 2017 at 23:58, Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: >>> > +name:test +(type:research (*:* -type:[* TO *])) >>> > >>> > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 11:47 PM, Furkan KAMACI < >>> furkankam...@gmail.com> >>> > wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi, >>> >> >>> >> I have a schema like: >>> >> >>> >> name, >>> >> department, >>> >> type >>> >> >>> >> type is an optional field. Some documents don't have that field. Let's >>> >> assume I have these: >>> >> >>> >> Doc 1: >>> >> name: test >>> >> type: research >>> >> >>> >> Doc 2: >>> >> name: test >>> >> type: developer >>> >> >>> >> Doc 3: >>> >> name: test >>> >> >>> >> I want to search name: test and type:research if type field exists >>> (result >>> >> will be Doc 1 and Doc 3). >>> >> >>> >> How can I do that? >>> >> >>> >> Kind Regards, >>> >> Furkan KAMACI >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Sincerely yours >>> > Mikhail Khludnev >>> >> >> >
