Thanks everyone for the responses, I will go with the latest bits for now; and will share how it goes.
@Toke, I stumbled upon your page last week but it seems that your huge index doesn't receive a lot of query traffic. Mine is around 60TB and receives around 120 queries per second; ~90 shards on 30 machines. I look forward to hear more scale stories. Nawab On Wed, May 24, 2017 at 7:58 AM, Toke Eskildsen <t...@kb.dk> wrote: > Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: > > On 5/24/2017 3:44 AM, Toke Eskildsen wrote: > >> It is relatively easy to downgrade to an earlier release within the > >> same major version. We have not switched to 6.5.1 simply because we > >> have no pressing need for it - Solr 6.3 works well for us. > > > That strikes me as a little bit dangerous, unless your indexes are very > > static. The Lucene index format does occasionally change in minor > > versions. > > Err.. Okay? Thank you for that. I was under the impression that the index > format was fixed (modulo critical bugs) for major versions. This will > change our approach to updating. > > Apologies for the confusion, > Toke >
