Hello, I was wondering if there was an added advantage in using <copyField /> to copy a string field to a text field?
If the field is copied to a text field then why not just make the field a text field and eliminate copying its data? If you are going to use full text searching on that field which you cant do with string fields wouldn't it just make sense to keep it a text field since it has the same abilities as a string field and more? ... Or is the reason because string fields have better performance on matching exact strings than text fields? Thanks, - Jake
