Yes, good old HTTP. wunder Walter Underwood wun...@wunderwood.org http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog)
> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:54 AM, David Hastings <hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Do you use HttpSolrClient then? > > On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 12:26 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> > wrote: > >> We run SolrJ 4.7.1 with Solr 6.5.1 (16 node cloud). No problems. >> >> We do not use the cloud-specific client and I’m pretty sure that we don’t >> use ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer. The latter is because it doesn’t report >> errors properly. >> >> We do our indexing through the load balancer and let the Solr Cloud >> cluster get the right docs to the right shards. That runs at 1 million >> docs/minute, so it isn’t worth doing anything fancier. >> >> wunder >> Walter Underwood >> wun...@wunderwood.org >> http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >> >> >>> On Sep 19, 2017, at 9:05 AM, David Hastings < >> hastings.recurs...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> What about the ConcurrentUpdateSolrServer for solrj? That is what almost >>> all of my indexing code is using for solr 5.x, Its been a while since I >>> experimented with upgrading but i seem to remember having to go >>> to HttpSolrClient and couldnt get the code to compile, so i tabled the >>> experiment for a while. eventually I will need to move to solr 6, but >> if i >>> could keep the same indexing code that would be ideal >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 19, 2017 at 11:59 AM, Erick Erickson < >> erickerick...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Felix: >>>> >>>> There's no specific testing that I know of for this issue, it's "best >>>> effort". Which means it _should_ work but I can't make promises. >>>> >>>> Now that said, underlying it all is just HTTP requests going back and >>>> forth so I know of no a-priori reasons it wouldn't be fine. It's just >>>> "try it and see" though. >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> Erick >>>> >>>> I'm probably preaching to the choir, but Java 1.7 is two years past >>>> the end of support from Oracle, somebody sometime has to deal with >>>> upgrading. >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 10:47 PM, Felix Stanley >>>> <felixstan...@globalsources.com> wrote: >>>>> Hi there, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> We are planning to use SOLR J 5.5.4 to query from SOLR 6.5. >>>>> >>>>> The reason was that we have to rely on JDK 1.7 at the client and as far >>>> as I >>>>> know SOLR J 6.x.x only support JDK 1.8. >>>>> >>>>> I understood that SOLR J generally maintains backwards/forward >>>> compatibility >>>>> from this article: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> https://wiki.apache.org/solr/Solrj >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Would there though be any exception that we need to take caution of for >>>> this >>>>> specific version? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks a lot. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Best Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Felix Stanley >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ---------------------- >>>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE >>>>> >>>>> This e-mail (including any attachments) may contain confidential and/or >>>> privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient or have >>>> received this e-mail in error, please inform the sender immediately and >>>> delete this e-mail (including any attachments) from your computer, and >> you >>>> must not use, disclose to anyone else or copy this e-mail (including any >>>> attachments), whether in whole or in part. >>>>> >>>>> This e-mail and any reply to it may be monitored for security, legal, >>>> regulatory compliance and/or other appropriate reasons. >>>> >> >>
