Sorry, I meant we are "not" running Solr in cloud mode On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 1:29 PM, Sundeep T <sundeep....@gmail.com> wrote:
> Yes, but that issue seems specific to SolrCloud like I mentioned. We are > running Solr in cloud mode and don't have Zookeeper configured > > Thanks > Sundeep > > On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Steve Rowe <sar...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Hi Sundeep, >> >> This looks to me like <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803> >> / <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-10506>, which was fixed in >> Solr 7.0. >> >> -- >> Steve >> www.lucidworks.com >> >> > On Sep 25, 2017, at 2:42 PM, Sundeep T <sundeep....@gmail.com> wrote: >> > >> > Hello, >> > >> > We are running our solr 6.4.2 instance on a single node without >> zookeeper. So, we are not using solr cloud. We have been ingesting about >> 50k messages per second into this instance spread over 4 cores. >> > >> > When we looked at the heapdump we see that it has there are around 385 >> million instances of VersionBucket objects taking about 8gb memory. This >> number seems to grow based on the number of cores into which we are >> ingesting data into.PFA a screen cap of heap recording. >> > >> > Browsing through the jira list we saw a similar issue - >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-9803 >> > >> > This issue is recently resolved by Erick. But this issue seems be >> specifically tied to SolrCloud mode and Zookeeper. We are not using any of >> these. >> > >> > So, we are thinking this could be another issue. Any one has ideas on >> what this could be and if there is a fix for it? >> > >> > Thanks >> > Sundeep >> >> >
