Is it possible that this field used to be text_en field and later you changed 
it to string_lower but did not reindex. If you open schema explorer in your 
admin GUI, what tokens do you see for this field?

Emir
--
Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection
Solr & Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - http://sematext.com/



> On 25 Jan 2018, at 12:25, Gopesh Sharma <gopesh_sha...@gensler.com> wrote:
> 
> Hello Emir,
> 
> Service.Solr/partners/select/?wt=json&fq=-partnerProjectCount_num:0&bf=searchScore_num&sort=score+desc&q=Construction%20Company&group=true&group.field=partnerName_text_en&group.ngroups=true&group.limit=100&rows=50&start=0&indent=true
>  
> 
> <field name=" partnerName_text_en"  type="string_lower" indexed="true"  
> stored="true" multiValued="false" />
> 
> I am using the above query.
> 
> Thanks,
> Gopesh Sharma
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Emir Arnautović [mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:31 PM
> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match
> 
> Hi Gopesh,
> No it is not - at least not in a way I was thinking. I should have been more 
> precise - I meant tokenized. So you are grouping on the field that uses this  
> field type? Can you share query?
> 
> Thanks,
> Emir
> --
> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & 
> Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - 
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsematext.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7CGopesh_Sharma%40gensler.com%7C04a138e3daf7423ba05f08d563e2e1ef%7C94a74758f2ff413c9f705725701b8d02%7C0%7C0%7C636524748464316159&sdata=wuZfMQmGJbnHkPVMjtnUysxHud4U9wP57tDh9kPKNig%3D&reserved=0
> 
> 
> 
>> On 25 Jan 2018, at 11:57, Gopesh Sharma <gopesh_sha...@gensler.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Hello Emir,
>> 
>> Thanks for the reply.
>> 
>> So if I am using below field type for the field, that means its analyzed?
>> 
>> <fieldType name="string_lower" class="solr.TextField" 
>> positionIncrementGap="100" autoGeneratePhraseQueries="true">
>>       <analyzer type="index">
>>           <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>>           <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>>       </analyzer>
>>       <analyzer type="query">
>>           <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>
>>           <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>>       </analyzer>
>> </fieldType>
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Gopesh Sharma
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Emir Arnautović [mailto:emir.arnauto...@sematext.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2018 4:16 PM
>> To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Grouping on Exact Match
>> 
>> Hi Gopesh,
>> You are probably grouping on field that is analysed so “Consulting” is group 
>> term. What you need to do is to have name field that is not alalysed and 
>> group on that field. If you want to “group” on query input, that is not 
>> grouping - you simply use phrase query and all results are of that group.
>> 
>> HTH,
>> Emir
>> --
>> Monitoring - Log Management - Alerting - Anomaly Detection Solr & 
>> Elasticsearch Consulting Support Training - 
>> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Fsemate
>> xt.com%2F&data=02%7C01%7CGopesh_Sharma%40gensler.com%7Cda7c34701f32465
>> 883cc08d563e0ddd3%7C94a74758f2ff413c9f705725701b8d02%7C0%7C0%7C6365247
>> 39799609813&sdata=yXhlw36459RoXTKifDyGPVy1bgTpcVWOdHfViuGJgg8%3D&reser
>> ved=0
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On 25 Jan 2018, at 11:41, Gopesh Sharma <gopesh_sha...@gensler.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hello All,
>>> 
>>> I am grouping the results but the groups are not happening on the 
>>> exact match. For Example : I have 5 documents with name Construction 
>>> Company, Construction Tower, Tower Company, Tower House and again 
>>> Construction Company. If I search for Construction Company with 
>>> grouping I am getting result as
>>> 
>>> 
>>> *   Construction having 3 documents -  Construction Company, Construction 
>>> Tower and Construction Company with group value construction.
>>> 
>>> Is there any way I can get only two results with group value as exact match 
>>> of the search item.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Gopesh Sharma
>> 
> 

Reply via email to