Hi, Have you already tried "group.cache.percent" parameter? It might improve grouping performance. Or if you try CollapsingQParser, you can use expand component to acquire all values in groups, I think. ( https://lucene.apache.org/solr/guide/6_6/collapse-and-expand-results.html#collapse-and-expand-results )
thanks, Yasufumi 2018年5月21日(月) 15:36 rubi.hali <rubih...@gmail.com>: > Hi Yasufumi > > Thanks for the reply. Yes, you are correct. I also checked the code and it > seems the same. > > We are facing performance issues due to grouping so wanted to be sure that > we are not leaving out any possibility of caching the same in Query Result > Cache. > > was just exploring field collapsing instead of grouping but It doesn't > fulfill our requirement of having all values in a facet for a group instead > of only grouped value. So we dont have any other choice but to go with > grouping and may be write some custom cache provider :( > > > > > > -- > Sent from: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html >
