Nothing in the logs it's like it didn't happen. So I think I need to address my logging levels log4j
On Tue, Jun 5, 2018, 12:35 AM Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes unix. > > It was an amazing moment. > > > > On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 11:28 PM Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> bq. To be clear I deleted the actual index files out from under the >> running master >> >> I'm assuming *nix here since Windows won't let you delete a file that >> has an open file handle... >> >> Did you then restart the master? Aside from any checks about refusing >> to replicate an empty index, just deleting the files without reloading >> the core (or restarting Solr) won't do it. Files disappear all the >> time out from under a running Solr, specifically during merges. >> However on linux machines those files are still available until the >> last file handle is closed, and Solr still points to those files until >> a hard commit or restart. More technically, until a new Searcher is >> opened. >> >> Here's a check: query the _master_ after deleting the index. Absent a >> commit of some sort, you'll probably get results. >> >> Mind you you still may not see a replication of an empty index, this >> is just another complication that you need to be aware of. >> >> Best, >> Erick >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 5:44 PM, Walter Underwood <wun...@wunderwood.org> >> wrote: >> > Check the logs. I bet it says something like “refusing to fetch empty >> index.” >> > >> > wunder >> > Walter Underwood >> > wun...@wunderwood.org >> > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) >> > >> >> On Jun 4, 2018, at 1:41 PM, Jeff Courtade <courtadej...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> >> >> I am thankful for that! >> >> >> >> Could you point me at something that explains this maybe? >> >> >> >> J >> >> >> >> On Mon, Jun 4, 2018, 4:31 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote: >> >> >> >>> On 6/4/2018 12:15 PM, Jeff Courtade wrote: >> >>>> This was strange as I would have thought the replica would have >> >>> replicated >> >>>> an empty index from the master. >> >>> >> >>> Solr actually has protections in place to specifically PREVENT index >> >>> replication when the master has an empty index. This is so that a >> >>> accidental mistake made on the master that clears its index cannot >> >>> completely delete the index on the slave. >> >>> >> >>> After you index some data into the new master index, if change meets >> the >> >>> "replicateAfter" settings, then the next poll made by the slave should >> >>> replicate the new index. >> >>> >> >>> Thanks, >> >>> Shawn >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >> >> >> Jeff Courtade >> >> M: 240.507.6116 >> > >> > -- > > Jeff Courtade > M: 240.507.6116 > -- Jeff Courtade M: 240.507.6116
