If this is still a problem in master/7x then a JIRA is in order.....
On Fri, Sep 7, 2018 at 7:40 AM Doug Turnbull
<dturnb...@opensourceconnections.com> wrote:
>
> Looks like this is indeed a bug
>
> My colleague debugged this behavior and it turns out that Solr only
> requests id and score from the shards, and not the user-specified field
> list. You can see that on this line
>
> https://github.com/apache/lucene-solr/blob/branch_7_4/solr/core/src/java/org/apache/solr/handler/component/MoreLikeThisComponent.java#L342
>
> Happy to create a Jira ticket
>
> -Doug
>
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 AM Charlie Hull <char...@flax.co.uk> wrote:
>
> > On 31/08/2018 19:36, Doug Turnbull wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > We're working on a Solr More Like This project (Solr 6.6.2), using the
> > More
> > > Like This searchComponent. What we note is in standalone Solr, when we
> > > request MLT using the search component, we get every more like this
> > > document fully formed with complete fields in the moreLikeThis section.
> >
> > Hey Doug,
> >
> > IIRC there wasn't a lot of support for MLT in cloud mode a few years
> > ago, and there are certainly still a few open issues around cloud support:
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-4414
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-5480
> > Maybe there are some hints in the ticket comments about different ways
> > to do what you want.
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Charlie
> >
> > >
> > > In cloud, however, with the exact same query and config, we only get the
> > > doc ids under "moreLikeThis" requiring us to fetch the metadata
> > associated
> > > with each document.
> > >
> > > I can't easily share an example due to confidentiality, but I want to
> > check
> > > if we're missing something? Documentation doesn't mention any
> > limitations.
> > > The only interesting note I've found is this one which points to a
> > > potential difference in behavior
> > >
> > >> The Cloud MLT Query Parser uses the realtime get handler to retrieve
> > the
> > > fields to be mined for keywords. Because of the way the realtime get
> > > handler is implemented, it does not return data for fields populated
> > using
> > > copyField.
> > >
> > > https://stackoverflow.com/a/46307140/8123
> > >
> > > Any thoughts?
> > >
> > > -Doug
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Charlie Hull
> > Flax - Open Source Enterprise Search
> >
> > tel/fax: +44 (0)8700 118334 <+44%20870%20011%208334>
> > mobile: +44 (0)7767 825828 <+44%207767%20825828>
> > web: www.flax.co.uk
> >
> --
> CTO, OpenSource Connections
> Author, Relevant Search
> http://o19s.com/doug
