you could change your indexer to index the values to a dynamic field *_ci for each of the facets. ie, your facet is organization. index to the string field, and also index it to the dynamic organization_ci field but there will not be a short cut way of doing this in the schema itself
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 1:03 AM Ritesh Kumar <ritesh.ku...@hotwaxsystems.com> wrote: > Yes, it can be used. > But, what if I have other such facets on different other fields. Use of > copyField will require me to create a dedicated copy field for each such > facet. > > I want to know if there is any other option where I do not have to add > multiple copy fields. > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 7:06 PM Mikhail Khludnev <m...@apache.org> wrote: > > > Hello, Ritesh. > > > > It's obviously done with copyField. > > > > On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 4:26 PM Ritesh Kumar < > > ritesh.ku...@hotwaxsystems.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hello team, > > > > > > I am trying to prepare facet on a field of type string. The facet data > > will > > > be shown according to the user's query on this very field. > > > > > > <field name="fieldName" type="string" indexed="true" stored="true" > > > required="false" multiValued="false"/> > > > > > > > > > As this field is of type string, it works fine with case sensitive > > query. I > > > want to be able to query on this field irrespective of the case. > > > > > > I tried changing the field type to string_ci as defined below > > > > > > <fieldType name="string_ci" class="solr.TextField" > sortMissingLast="true" > > > omitNorms="true"> > > > <analyzer type="query"> > > > <tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/> > > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/> > > > </analyzer> > > > </fieldType> > > > > > > <field name="fieldName" type="string_ci" indexed="true" stored="true" > > > required="false" multiValued="false"/> > > > > > > Now, in this case, I am able to perform a case-insensitive query but > the > > > facet values are being shown in lowercase. > > > > > > I want to be able to perform a case-insensitive query on this field but > > > show the original data. > > > Is there anything I can do achieve this. > > > > > > Best, > > > > > > -- > > > Ritesh Kumar > > > > > > > > > -- > > Sincerely yours > > Mikhail Khludnev > > >
