What can we do in this scenario as the solr master node is going down and the indexing is failing. Please provide some workaround for this issue.
On Sat, 1 Feb, 2020, 11:51 PM Walter Underwood, <wun...@wunderwood.org> wrote: > What message do you get about the heap space. > > It is completely normal for Java to use all of heap before running a major > GC. That > is how the JVM works. > > wunder > Walter Underwood > wun...@wunderwood.org > http://observer.wunderwood.org/ (my blog) > > > On Feb 1, 2020, at 6:35 AM, Rajdeep Sahoo <rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > Please reply anyone > > > > On Fri, 31 Jan, 2020, 11:37 PM Rajdeep Sahoo, < > rajdeepsahoo2...@gmail.com> > > wrote: > > > >> This is happening when the no of indexed document count is increasing. > >> With 1 million docs it's working fine but when it's crossing 4.5 > >> million it's heap space is getting full. > >> > >> > >> On Wed, 22 Jan, 2020, 7:05 PM Michael Gibney, < > mich...@michaelgibney.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >>> Rajdeep, you say that "suddenly" heap space is getting full ... does > >>> this mean that some variant of this configuration was working for you > >>> at some point, or just that the failure happens quickly? > >>> > >>> If heap space and faceting are indeed the bottleneck, you might make > >>> sure that you have docValues enabled for your facet field fieldTypes, > >>> and perhaps set uninvertible=false. > >>> > >>> I'm not seeing where large numbers of facets initially came from in > >>> this thread? But on that topic this is perhaps relevant, regarding the > >>> potential utility of a facet cache: > >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-13807 > >>> > >>> Michael > >>> > >>> On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 7:16 AM Toke Eskildsen <t...@kb.dk> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, 2020-01-19 at 21:19 -0500, Mehai, Lotfi wrote: > >>>>> I had a similar issue with a large number of facets. There is no way > >>>>> (At least I know) your can get an acceptable response time from > >>>>> search engine with high number of facets. > >>>> > >>>> Just for the record then it is doable under specific circumstances > >>>> (static single-shard index, only String fields, Solr 4 with patch, > >>>> fixed list of facet fields): > >>>> https://sbdevel.wordpress.com/2013/03/20/over-9000-facet-fields/ > >>>> > >>>> More usable for the current case would be to play with facet.threads > >>>> and throw hardware with many CPU-cores after the problem. > >>>> > >>>> - Toke Eskildsen, Royal Danish Library > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >> > >
