What did you end up doing, Eric? Did you migrate to the Unified Highlighter? ~ David
On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 4:36 PM Eric Allen <eric.al...@netdocuments.com> wrote: > Thanks for the reply. > > Currently we are migrating from solr4 to solr8 under solr 4 we wrote our > own highlighter because the provided one was too slow for our documents. > > We deal with many large documents, but we have full term vectors already. > So as I understand it from my reading of the code the unified highlighter > should be fast even on these large documents. > > The concern about alternate fields was if the highlighter was slow we > could just return highlights from one field if they existed and if not then > highlight the other fields. > > From my research I'm leaning towards returning highlights from all the > fields we are interested in because I feel it will be fast. > > Eric Allen - Software Devloper, NetDocuments > eric.al...@netdocuments.com | O: 801.989.9691 | C: 801.989.9691 > > -----Original Message----- > From: sasarun <sasa...@gmail.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2019 2:45 AM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Highlighting Solr 8 > > Hi Eric, > > Unified highlighter does not have an option to provide alternate field > when highlighting. That option is available with Orginal and fast vector > highlighter. As indicated in the Solr documentation, Unified is the > recommended method for highlighting to meet most of the use cases. Please > do share more details in case you are facing any specific issue with > highlighting. > > Thanks, > > Arun > > > > > -- > Sent from: https://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Solr-User-f472068.html > >
