Thank you Shawn for the valuable inputs.

I am assuming, please correct me if I am wrong =>
If we have two fields one has a large amount of text wrt to a field with
shorter text like description and title.
So, the Number of the tokens created for the description field will be much
high w.r.t. the title.
So if I search in the title field, it will be comparatively fast w.r.t. to
the description field

If the above listed is true then in the case of merged fields, no of tokens
have increased exponentially in a single merged field and could be a
possible reason?


On Thu, Nov 19, 2020 at 5:06 PM Shawn Heisey <apa...@elyograg.org> wrote:

> On 11/19/2020 2:12 AM, Ajay Sharma wrote:
> > Earlier we were searching in 6 fields i.e qf is applied on 6 fields like
> > below
>
> <snip>
>
> > We merged all these 6 fields into one field X and now while searching we
> > using this single filed X
>
> <snip>
>
> > We are able to see a decrease in index size but the response time has
> > increased.
>
> I can't say for sure, but I would imagine that when querying multiple
> fields using edismax, Solr can manage to do some of that work in
> parallel.  But with only one field, any parallel processing is lost.  If
> I have the right idea, that could explain what you are seeing.
>
> Somebody with far more intimate knowledge of edismax will need to
> confirm or refute my thoughts.
>
> Thanks,
> Shawn
>


-- 
Thanks & Regards,
Ajay Sharma
Product Search
+91-8954492245

-- 

Reply via email to