Are each of those queries unique? First time queries are slower. They are cached by Solr and the same query again will return results very quickly because it won't need to hit the file system.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 4:08 PM, sunnyfr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm doing a stress test on solr. > I've around 8,5M of doc, the size of my data's directory is 5,6G. > > I've indexed again my data to make it faster, and applied all the last > patch. > My index data store just two field : id and text (which is a copy of three > fiels) > But I still think it's very long, what do you think? > > For 50request/sec during 40mn, my average respond time : 1235msec. > 49430request. > > When I make this test with 100request second during 10mn and 10 other > minutes with 50 request : my average respond time is 1600msec. Don't you > think it's a bit long. > > Should I partition this index more ? or what should I do to make this work > faster. > I can read post with people who have just 300msec request for 300Go of > index > partionned ? > My request for collecting all this book is quite complex and have lot of > table linked together, maybe it would be faster if I create a csv file ? > > The server that I'm using for the test has 8G of memory. > 4CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU 5160 @ 3.00GHz > Tomcat55 : -Xms2000m -Xmx4000m > Solr 1.3. > > What can I modify to make it more performant ? memory, indexation ...? > Does it can come from my request to the mysql database which is too much > linked ? > > Thanks a lot for your help, > Johanna > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/Make-it-more-performant---solr-1.3---1200msec-respond-time.-tp20953079p20953079.html > Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
