Hi Erick, I still don't get it.The scenario is like this.
Intially i indexed the content with the stop word filter at both index time and query time.That means the stop words are not there in the index . Now i removed the stop filter only at query time so that a query like this will not fetch results content:the AND id:8 as due to the stop filter this query becomes just id:8 and returns results. Why would i have to reindex as there shloud not be any stop words in the index in the first place. Thanks for your time . Regards On 3/21/09, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yes, you do need to reindex after removing the stopword filter > from the configuration. When you indexed the first time using > the stopword filter, the words were NOT indexed, so they won't > be found now that they're getting through the query analyzer. > > Best > Erick > > On Fri, Mar 20, 2009 at 1:02 PM, revas <revas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hi Erik, > > > > I have now commented the query time stopword analyzer .I restarted the > > server.But now when i search for a stop word ,i am getting results. > > > > We had earlier indexed the content with the stop word analyzer.I dont > think > > we need to reindex after commentting the query analyzer,right? > > > > This field is a text field with the defaul analyzer. > > > > Please let me know if i have missed something here. > > > > Regards > > Sujatha > > > > > > On 3/17/09, Erick Erickson <erickerick...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > Well, by definition, using an analyzer that removes stopwords > > > *should* do this at query time. This assumes that you used > > > an analyzer that removed stopwords at index and query time. > > > The stopwords are not in the index. > > > > > > You can get the behavior you expect by using an analyzer at > > > query time that does NOT remove stopwords, and one at > > > indexing time that *does* remove stopwords. Gut I'm having a > > > hard time imagining that this would result in a good user experience. > > > > > > I mean anytime that you had a stopword in the query where the > > > stopword was required, no results would be returned. Which would > > > be hard to explain to a user.... > > > > > > What is it you're trying to accomplish? > > > > > > Best > > > Erick > > > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 7:40 AM, revas <revas...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > I have a query like this > > > > > > > > content:the AND iuser_id:5 > > > > > > > > which means return all docs of user id 5 which have the word "the" in > > > > content .Since 'the' is a stop word ,this query executes as just > > user_id > > > :5 > > > > inspite of the "AND" clause ,Whereas the expected result here is > since > > > > there > > > > is no result for "the " ,no results shloud be returned. > > > > > > > > Am i missing anythin here? > > > > > > > > Regards > > > > > > > > > >
