Excellent! Thank you I am going to start testing that. -- Jeff Newburn Software Engineer, Zappos.com jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562
> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@corp.aol.com> > Reply-To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 20:26:02 +0530 > To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> > Subject: Re: <no subject> aka Replication Stall > > the patches have gone into the trunk. The latest patch should be the > one if you wish to run a patched Solr. > > 10 secs readTimeout means that if there is no data coming from the > other end for 10 secs, then the waiting thread returns throwing an > exception. It is not the total time taken to read the entire data. At > least that is what I observed while testing. > > BTW, if the timeout occurs it resumes from the point where the failure > happened. It retries 5 times before giving up. > > On Thu, May 7, 2009 at 7:32 PM, Jeff Newburn <jnewb...@zappos.com> wrote: >> We have not pushed the fix into production yet. However, I am wondering two >> things. 1. If the download takes more than 10 seconds (our replication can >> take up to 90 seconds) will that be an issue 2. There are 3 patches, 2 have >> 2 line changes 1 has a large amount. Do we need the latest 2 or just the >> latest 1? >> >> -- >> Jeff Newburn >> Software Engineer, Zappos.com >> jnewb...@zappos.com - 702-943-7562 >> >> >>> From: Noble Paul നോബിള് नोब्ळ् <noble.p...@gmail.com> >>> Reply-To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >>> Date: Wed, 6 May 2009 10:05:49 +0530 >>> To: <solr-user@lucene.apache.org> >>> Subject: Re: <no subject> aka Replication Stall >>> >>> SOLR-1096 >> >> > > > > -- > ----------------------------------------------------- > Noble Paul | Principal Engineer| AOL | http://aol.com
