Jonathan Mamou schrieb:
Thanks Michael for your answer!
I think that (?:(?!(\w+:|\d+)))[\p{L}]+
should also be OK.
Oh yes, that's much simpler and clearer than my suggestion.
(Newbieness factor for Java style regular expressions, too.)
Or maybe this: (?:(?!(\w+:|\d+)))[\p{L}\d_]+ :-)
Michael Ludwig
