That's right. Simple. I can very well do that. Why didn't I think of it. Thanks.
rswart wrote: > > What is stopping you from defining different field types for faqs and > attorneys? One with index time synomyms and one without. > > > > anuvenk wrote: >> >> I've posted a few questions on synonyms before and finally understood how >> it worked and settled with index-time synonyms. Seems to work much better >> than query time synonyms. But now @ my work, they have a special request. >> They want certain synonyms to be applied only to certain sections of the >> index. >> For example, we have legal faqs, forms etc and we have attorneys in our >> index. >> The following synonyms for example, >> california,san diego >> florida,miami >> So for a search 'real estate san diego', it makes sense to return all >> faqs, forms for 'california' in the index but doesn't make sense to >> return a real estate attorney elsewhere in california (like burbank) >> besides just restricting to san diego attorneys. >> To be more clear I want to be able to return all california faqs & forms >> for 'real estate san diego' but not all california attorneys for the >> same. That means, i should index the faqs, forms with the state => city >> mappings as above but not for attorneys. >> Well I could index all other resources like faqs, forms first with these >> synonyms, then remove them and index attorneys. But that wouldn't work >> well in my case because we have a scheduler set up that runs every night >> to index any new resources from our database. >> Can someone suggest a good solution for this? >> >> >> >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-apply-index-time-synonyms-just-for-a-section-of-the-index-tp24209490p24210788.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
