> Are you saying that we have to use LuSql replacing our Solr? To load your data: Yes, it is an option To search your data: No, LuSql is only a loading tool
-glen 2009/7/2 Francis Yakin <fya...@liquid.com>: > > Glen, > > Are you saying that we have to use LuSql replacing our Solr? > > Francis > > -----Original Message----- > From: Glen Newton [mailto:glen.new...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, July 01, 2009 8:06 PM > To: solr-user@lucene.apache.org > Subject: Re: Is there any other way to load the index beside using "http" > connection? > > You can directly load to the backend Lucene using LuSql[1]. It is > faster than Solr, sometimes as much as an order of magnitude faster. > > Disclosure: I am the author of LuSql > > -Glen > http://zzzoot.blogspot.com/ > > [1]http://lab.cisti-icist.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca/cistilabswiki/index.php/LuSql > > 2009/7/1 Francis Yakin <fya...@liquid.com>: >> >> We have several thousands of xml files in database that we load it to solr >> master >> The Database uses "http" connection and transfer those files to solr >> master. Solr then translate xml files to their lindex. >> >> We are experiencing issue with close/open connection in the firewall and >> very very slow. >> >> Is there any other way to load the data/index from Database to solr master >> beside using http connection, so it means we just scp/ftp the xml file from >> Database system to solr master and let solr convert those to lucene indexes? >> >> Any input or help will be much appreciated. >> >> >> Thanks >> >> Francis >> >> >> >> > > > > -- > > - > -- -
