Jason, sounds like a very promising change to me - so much that I would gladly work toward creating a patch myself. Are there any specific points in the code u could point me to if I wanna look at how to start off implementing it? Lucene/Solr Classes involved etc? i'll start looking myself anyhow but any tips would be helpful.. :)
Thanks, -Chak Jason Rutherglen-2 wrote: > > This will be implemented as you're stating when > IndexWriter.getReader is incorporated. This will carry over > deletes in RAM until IW.commit is called (i.e. Solr commit). > It's a fairly simple change though perhaps too late for 1.4 > release? > > On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 3:10 PM, KaktuChakarabati<jimmoe...@gmail.com> > wrote: >> >> Hey, >> I was wondering - is there a mechanism in lucene and/or solr to mark a >> document in the index >> as deleted and then have this change reflect in query serving without >> performing the whole >> commit/warmup cycle? this seems to me largely appealing as it allows a >> kind >> of solution >> where deletes are simply processed by marking them in a bitmap or some >> such >> structure >> and then intersecting search results with those on a per-shard basis. >> >> Anything in that direction? Otherwise, is there any critical issue >> preventing such an implementation? >> >> Thanks >> -Chak >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/Incremental-Deletes-to-Index-tp25143093p25143093.html >> Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Incremental-Deletes-to-Index-tp25143093p25144124.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
