On Fri, Aug 28, 2009 at 12:57 AM, Rihaed Tan <tanrihae...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > I have a similar requirement to Matthew (from his post 2 years ago). Is > this > still the way to go in storing both the ID and name/value for facet values? > I'm planning to use id#name format if this is still the case and doing a > prefix query. I believe this is a common requirement so I'd appreciate if > any of you guys can share what's the best way to do it. > > Also, I'm indexing the facet values for text search as well. Should the > field declaration below suffice the requirement? > > <field name="category" type="text" indexed="true" stored="true" > required="true" multiValued="true"/> > There have been talks of having a pair field type in Solr but there is no patch yet. So I guess the way proposed by Yonik is a good solution. -- Regards, Shalin Shekhar Mangar.
