I had the same problem again yesterday except the process halted after about 20mins this time.
pof wrote: > > Hello, I was running a batch index the other day using the Solrj > EmbeddedSolrServer when the process abruptly froze in it's tracks after > running for about 4-5 hours and indexing ~400K documents. There were no > document locks so it would seem likely that there was some kind of thread > deadlock. I was hoping someone might be able to tell me some information > about the following thread dump taken at the time: > > Full thread dump OpenJDK Client VM (1.6.0-b09 mixed mode): > > "DestroyJavaVM" prio=10 tid=0x9322a800 nid=0xcef waiting on condition > [0x00000000..0x0018a044] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > > "Java2D Disposer" daemon prio=10 tid=0x0a28cc00 nid=0xf1c in Object.wait() > [0x0311d000..0x0311def4] > java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x97a96840> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) > - locked <0x97a96840> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) > at sun.java2d.Disposer.run(Disposer.java:143) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) > > "pool-1-thread-1" prio=10 tid=0x93a26c00 nid=0xcf7 waiting on condition > [0x08a6a000..0x08a6b074] > java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (parking) > at sun.misc.Unsafe.park(Native Method) > - parking to wait for <0x967acfd0> (a > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject) > at > java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.park(LockSupport.java:186) > at > java.util.concurrent.locks.AbstractQueuedSynchronizer$ConditionObject.await(AbstractQueuedSynchronizer.java:1978) > at > java.util.concurrent.LinkedBlockingQueue.take(LinkedBlockingQueue.java:386) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.getTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1043) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor.runWorker(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:1103) > at > java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java:603) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:636) > > "Low Memory Detector" daemon prio=10 tid=0x93a00c00 nid=0xcf5 runnable > [0x00000000..0x00000000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > > "CompilerThread0" daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe9800 nid=0xcf4 waiting on > condition [0x00000000..0x096a7af4] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > > "Signal Dispatcher" daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fe8800 nid=0xcf3 waiting on > condition [0x00000000..0x00000000] > java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE > > "Finalizer" daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd7000 nid=0xcf2 in Object.wait() > [0x005ca000..0x005caef4] > java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x966e6d40> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:133) > - locked <0x966e6d40> (a java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue$Lock) > at java.lang.ref.ReferenceQueue.remove(ReferenceQueue.java:149) > at java.lang.ref.Finalizer$FinalizerThread.run(Finalizer.java:177) > > "Reference Handler" daemon prio=10 tid=0x09fd2c00 nid=0xcf1 in > Object.wait() [0x00579000..0x00579d74] > java.lang.Thread.State: WAITING (on object monitor) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Native Method) > - waiting on <0x966e6dc8> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) > at java.lang.Object.wait(Object.java:502) > at > java.lang.ref.Reference$ReferenceHandler.run(Reference.java:133) > - locked <0x966e6dc8> (a java.lang.ref.Reference$Lock) > > "VM Thread" prio=10 tid=0x09fcf800 nid=0xcf0 runnable > > "VM Periodic Task Thread" prio=10 tid=0x93a02400 nid=0xcf6 waiting on > condition > > JNI global references: 1072 > > Heap > def new generation total 36288K, used 23695K [0x93f10000, 0x96670000, > 0x96670000) > eden space 32256K, 73% used [0x93f10000, 0x95633f60, 0x95e90000) > from space 4032K, 0% used [0x95e90000, 0x95e90000, 0x96280000) > to space 4032K, 0% used [0x96280000, 0x96280000, 0x96670000) > tenured generation total 483968K, used 72129K [0x96670000, 0xb3f10000, > 0xb3f10000) > the space 483968K, 14% used [0x96670000, 0x9ace04b8, 0x9ace0600, > 0xb3f10000) > compacting perm gen total 23040K, used 22983K [0xb3f10000, 0xb5590000, > 0xb7f10000) > the space 23040K, 99% used [0xb3f10000, 0xb5581ff8, 0xb5582000, > 0xb5590000) > No shared spaces configured. > > Cheers. Brett. > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Solrj-possible-deadlock-tp25530146p25531321.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
