That's perfect. Reimporting and reindexing some redundantly because of the slight time overlap is worth the risk of losing docs. Thanks Shalin.
Michael Shalin Shekhar Mangar wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 9:46 PM, michael8 <mich...@saracatech.com> wrote: > >> >> Thanks for your clarification Shalin. >> >> Given your explanation, would you agree that there is still a small >> window >> (how ever small this may be) where some documents could be missed in the >> next delta using dih.last_index_time if the data source adds or updates >> documents very frequently? i.e. the time between the SQL done executing >> and >> data received by Solr to start indexing, some new/updated documents may >> have >> been written in the DB such that the timestamps for those documents are >> slightly before the captured last_index_time when indexing starts? >> >> > The last_index_time is recorded before any SQL queries are fired so I > don't > think any rows could be missed. Some could be imported more than once > though. > > -- > Regards, > Shalin Shekhar Mangar. > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/dih.last_index_time---exacty-what-time-is-this-capturing--tp25827228p25850464.html Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
