You should be ok with the the revision option below. Look for the
highest revision number in the list of files in the patch as
subversion increments revision number on a repo basis not a file basis
so the highest number will represent the current state of all the
files when the patch was made if that make sense
Regards
Dave
On 4 Nov 2009, at 03:40, michael8 <mich...@saracatech.com> wrote:
Perfect. This is what I need to know instead of patching 'in the
dark'.
Good thing SVN revision cuts across all files like a tag.
Thanks Mike!
Michael
cambridgemike wrote:
You can see what revision the patch was written for at the top of the
patch,
it will look like this:
Index: org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java
===================================================================
--- org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java (revision
772437)
+++ org/apache/solr/handler/MoreLikeThisHandler.java (working copy)
now check out revision 772437 using the --revision switch in svn,
patch
away, and then svn up to make sure everything merges cleanly. This
is a
good guide to follow as well:
http://www.mail-archive.com/solr-user@lucene.apache.org/msg10189.html
cheers,
-mike
On Mon, Nov 2, 2009 at 3:55 PM, michael8 <mich...@saracatech.com>
wrote:
Hi,
First I like to pardon my novice question on patching solr (1.4).
What I
like to know is, given a patch, like the one for collapse field, how
would
one go about knowing what solr source that patch is meant for
since this
is
a source level patch? Wouldn't the exact versions of a set of
java files
to
be patched critical for the patch to work properly?
So far what I have done is to pull the latest collapse field patch
down
from
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236 (field-
collapse-5.patch),
and
then svn up the latest trunk from
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/lucene/solr/trunk/, then patch and
build.
Intuitively I was thinking I should be doing svn up to a specific
revision/tag instead of just latest. So far everything seems
fine, but I
just want to make sure I'm doing the right thing and not just being
lucky.
Thanks,
Michael
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/apply-a-patch-on-solr-tp26157827p26157827.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
View this message in context:
http://old.nabble.com/apply-a-patch-on-solr-tp26157827p26189573.html
Sent from the Solr - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
