Thanks Hoss, the problem is resolved. The real problem was my query parameter. I was storing daysForFilter with offset of 1 sec, and date in query parameter "facet.date.start" also had same offset. This was causing the overlaps, as in the facet value of 2009-10-23T18:30:01 was matching both 2009-10-23T18:30:01 and 2009-10-24T18:30:01.
just changing the query to "q=<something>&facet=true&facet.date=daysForFilter&facet.date.start=2009-10-23T18:30:00Z&facet.date.gap=%2B1DAY&facet.date.end=2009-10-28T18:30:00Z" works. thanks any way. regards, aakash. On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 9:43 PM, Chris Hostetter <hossman_luc...@fucit.org>wrote: > > : > q=<something>&facet=true&facet.date=daysForFilter&facet.date.start=2009-10-23T18:30:01Z&facet.date.gap=%2B1DAY&facet.date.end=2009-10-28T18:30:01Z > > : For example I get total 18 documents for my query, and the facet count > for > : date 2009-10-23T18:30:01Z is 11; whereas there are only 5 documents > : containing this field value. I have verified this in result. Also when I > : query for daysForFilter:2009-10-23T18:30:01Z, it gives me 5 results. > > I think you are missunderstanding what date faceting does. you have a > facet.date.gap of +1DAY, which means the facet count is anything between > 2009-10-23T18:30:01Z and 2009-10-24T18:30:01Z inclusively. you can verify > this using a range query (not a term query) ... > > daysForFilter:[2009-10-23T18:30:01Z TO 2009-10-23T18:30:01Z+1DAY] > > if you only want to facet on a unique moment in time (not a range) then > you cna use facet.query ... or you can set the facet gap smaller. > > you should also take a look at facet.date.hardend... > http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SimpleFacetParameters#facet.date.hardend > > > -Hoss > >
